1. General	2. Registration
3. External Students and Students Working Away From Queen’s	4. Period of Study
5. Progress	6. Assessment/Award

Note: The following regulations cover all students on research degree programmes.  For students registered for the PhD by Published Works, ‘supervisor’ should be substituted with ‘adviser’ in the following regulations.

Note: Where specific members of staff or committees are designated in these regulations to undertake particular School-related responsibilities, the relevant Head of School retains the discretion to appoint a nominee or equivalent committee as appropriate.

---

1. General

1.1 All research students must comply with relevant health and safety legislation, University health and safety regulations, and any specific health and safety requirements applying in the School where the research is being undertaken or in any location, including locations outside the University, where the student is undertaking research.

1.2 All research students must comply with the University’s Code of Conduct and Integrity in Research; the Intellectual Property Policy; and policies and procedures for research ethics, including those applying in their discipline; and must obtain, through their supervisor(s), any necessary ethical approval for the research.

1.3 Students must comply with the University’s training requirements, the training requirements of their funding body and with any compulsory or recommended training requirements in place in their School.

---

2. Registration

2.1 Students commencing a new programme of study shall be required to matriculate when registering for the first time on that programme.

2.2 Students must register at the start of research and at the beginning of every subsequent academic year.  Registration in the second and subsequent years shall be subject to satisfactory progress reports (see 6.5).

2.3 The following registration statuses are applicable:

1. Full-time - Full-time registration is equivalent to periods of study, tuition or work experience (whether at University premises or otherwise) which together amount to an average of at least 21 hours per week, normally over a period of more than 18 weeks.  This incurs the full-time fee.
2. Part-time - Part-time registration is equivalent to periods of study, tuition or work experience (whether at University premises or otherwise) which are less than 21 hours per week, normally over a period of more than 18 weeks.  This incurs the part-time fee.
3. Writing-Up – Following confirmation by the progress review panel (see 5.5) that the student has completed all the necessary research, and approval by the School Postgraduate Research Committee (SPRC), a student may be registered for a writing-up year. Students may not transfer writing-up status until they have been enrolled for the normal period of study for their research degree programme. The maximum period to be registered as writing up status is 12 months for both full-time and part-time students. This incurs the writing-up fee. 
4. Graduation Only - Once a research degree submission has been submitted/resubmitted for examination, the student’s status will be changed to Graduation Only. No further tuition fee is incurred.
5. Resubmission - Where a student is required to revise and resubmit following their oral examination, the status is changed to Resubmission and the student will be liable for a resubmission charge.

2.4 Students who have registered for a particular period as full-time, part-time or writing-up must apply through their supervisors to the SPRC for permission for any change in registration during that

2.5 Registration for PhD by Published Works will be on a part-time basis.  This incurs the PhD by Published Works fee.

2.6 Research students may not register for any other course of study leading to a degree, diploma or professional qualification, at this or any other institution, while they are registered as research students.  In exceptional circumstances, and only with the agreement of the supervisors, the Head of School may grant such permission, for a short, fixed period of time. Exceptions to this regulation may be permitted for students registered on joint research degree programmes, where the registration arrangements should be outlined in a formal agreement between Queen’s University Belfast and the partner institution(s).

---

3. External Students and Students Working Away From Queen’s

3.1 Regulations in this section are not applicable for PhD by Published Works.

3.2 Students shall be in regular attendance at the University and have regular meetings with their supervisor(s) while registered as research students.

3.3 Students may, however, apply to the SPRC for permission to study for a research degree programme through a distance learning mode of study, whereby students would spend part or all of the period of study working away from the University.  The SPRC shall grant permission only if it is satisfied that suitable arrangements for support, supervision and training are in place, and that the necessary resources are available at the student’s location.

3.4 Where arrangements include joint supervision with a supervisor based at the student’s external location, leading to either a single or joint Doctoral award, the approval procedures for collaborative research degree programmes must be applied. This includes approval of recognised supervisor status for the externally-based supervisor.

3.5 Permission to spend the whole period of research away from Queen’s shall not normally be granted, and students shall normally be required to visit the University annually to take part in formal annual reviews of progress and to undertake the oral examination after the research degree submission has been submitted.

3.6 Students remain subject to University regulations for the research degree programme during any period spent away from the University.

---

4.5 The maximum period within which students must submit all research elements required for the degree for examination and by which all taught elements must have been completed is calculated from the date that is officially recorded as the commencement of the programme.  These periods exclude suspension, but not extension, of studies.  Sponsored students may also be subject to their sponsors’ requirements in respect of either submission or qualification rates.

4.6 Students shall be expected to submit within the normal period of study for their research degree programme.  Any requests to submit earlier (within the minimum period), or later (within the maximum period) must be submitted to the SPRC for consideration and approval.  

4.7 For any extension beyond the normal period, an action plan shall be agreed with the student setting out what needs to be achieved during the extension period.

4.8 Special arrangements shall apply to part-time research students registered for the PhD programme, who are employed by the University as contract research assistants.  Provided they have the support of their supervisors and the approval of the SPRC, such students may submit after a minimum period of three years from the date of first registration as an undifferentiated research student.

4.9 For students permitted to transfer from full-time to part-time registration, and vice versa, one unit of full-time registration shall be considered equivalent to two units of part-time registration.

---

5. Progress

5.1 Supervision

5.1.1 Every registered research student in the University must have a core supervisory team comprising a principal supervisor and a second or co-supervisor. A third supervisor, who may be internal or external to the University, may be appointed where a student’s research is interdisciplinary, or would benefit from external input. A student should have no more than three supervisors at any one time, unless necessary to meet the requirements of an approved collaborative research degree agreement. The principal supervisor shall have overall responsibility for the student and the research. The student shall be expected to maintain effective contact with all members of the supervisory team.

5.1.2 Students registered for the PhD by Published Works must have one adviser in lieu of a supervisory team, to advise on the critical analysis that shall accompany the works, and to support the student through the process of submission and examination of the published works. Regulations which refer to the supervisor, or supervisory team, apply in relation to the adviser, as appropriate.

5.1.3 Each member of the supervisory team shall be experienced in, and actively engaged in, research and/or scholarly activity; hold a research degree at the same level as, or higher than, the degree being supervised or has appropriate equivalent experience or professional qualifications or status; and has an understanding of University and School policies and procedures concerning research students and supervisory responsibilities.

5.1.4 At least one of the student’s supervisors shall have successfully supervised a Doctoral degree to completion, either individually or as part of a supervisory team.

5.1.5 At least one member of the supervisory team shall be currently engaged in research in the relevant discipline(s), so as to ensure that the direction and monitoring of the student's progress is informed by up to date subject knowledge and research developments.

5.1.6 All new supervisors must complete the University’s training course for supervisors before appointment.

5.1.7 Principal supervisors should be a current member of staff from the School/Institute where the student is carrying out the research, who holds an academic position of lecturer or above.

5.1.8 Where the principal supervisor is a lecturer on probation, the member of staff must have gained a doctoral degree and have at least three years’ experience since its award and should also be employed on a contract that would cover the duration of the proposed research degree to be supervised. In addition, the second or co-supervisor must be a senior academic (at senior lecturer level or above) with experience of successfully supervising at least two doctoral students through to completion as principal supervisor.

 5.1.9 Staff on an Education contract may be appointed as principal supervisor where their current scholarly research is of significant relevance and the co-supervisor is employed on a Research and Education contract with experience of successfully supervising at least two doctoral students through to completion.

5.1.10 A research fellow employed on a contract that would cover the duration of the proposed research degree to be supervised, who is leading an independent research programme and of equivalent status to lecturer or above, or a holder of an institutional fellowship scheme (e.g. the Illuminate Fellowship Scheme), may be considered for appointment as principal supervisor. This category of staff must be supported by an experienced second or co- supervisor who has successfully supervised at least two doctoral students through to completion.

5.1.11 Staff in the University Colleges may be appointed as principal supervisors under the terms of the Agreements between the University and the University Colleges.

5.1.12 Staff eligible for appointment as second or co-supervisors include those eligible as principal supervisor, lecturers on probation (with no restrictions on experience), staff on an Education contract, honorary title holders, and recognised supervisors under an approved collaborative research degree agreement.

5.1.13 The second or co-supervisor may, if appropriate, be from a different School (or Institution, for recognised supervisors) to the one in which the student is carrying out the research.

5.1.14 Where an internal third supervisor is appointed, they must meet the criteria listed above.

5.1.15 An external supervisor from another university or organisation may be appointed to the supervisory team, where they meet the criteria outlined in regulation 5.1.3. This will be as a third, external supervisor, in addition to the principal and second or co-supervisor from the University, with the exception of honorary title holders, or recognised supervisors under an approved collaborative research agreement.

5.1.16 If, for any reason, a principal or co-supervisor shall be unavailable for contact by a student for a significant period which impinges negatively on the progress of the student’s project, a replacement shall be appointed as a principal or co-supervisor as appropriate. The replacement may be on a permanent or interim basis, as determined by the SPRC.

5.1.17 Supervisory responsibilities can be changed at the request of a student or a supervisor, taking into account the requirements of sponsors. Normally, any change of supervisor shall be by mutual agreement between the student and the University. If, for any reason, a change of supervisor(s) is required during the period of the research, the above criteria shall apply to the appointment of the new supervisor(s).

5.1.18 At an initial supervisory meeting between the student and supervisory team, the following shall be agreed:

1. Roles and responsibilities of the student and each member of the supervisory team.
2. The frequency, duration and format of formal meetings.

5.2 Research Plan

Both full-time and part-time research students must agree a research plan with their supervisors at the outset of the research (which should be updated as appropriate throughout the period of study), and attend courses and perform research work as specified in the research plan.

5.3 Initial Review

Students must submit a project summary and research plan, approved by the supervisory team, for independent Initial Review by the Head of School or nominee, within three months (FTE) of first registration.  The independent reviewer shall determine the feasibility of the project and the research plan, outlining any required amendments, and taking account of the required timeframe for the degree.  This shall not be required for PhD by Published Works.

5.4 Regular Progress Monitoring

5.4.1. There shall be ten formal meetings per year between the principal supervisor (and/or co-supervisor, if appointed) and full-time student (six for part- time and  writing-up students) to monitor progress against the research plan. All members of the supervisory team shall attend at least half of these meetings. Minutes of the meetings shall be retained as records

5.4.2. A supervisor who has concerns about a student’s progress at times other than the normal Annual Progress Review period outlined in 6.5, shall inform the student in writing of the areas of concern and invite the student to a meeting to discuss the concerns.  Following the meeting, and taking account of all known circumstances, the supervisors may do one of the following:

1. Agree a plan of action for the student, with a review date, and monitor the student’s attendance, progress and performance during that period.  If the student’s performance has not improved within the specified period, the supervisors shall notify the Head of School or nominee and submit a report for review by the SPRC.
2. In exceptional circumstances, notify the Head of School or nominee and submit a report for review by the SPRC, without undertaking a period of monitoring.

5.4.3. In either case, where a supervisor report is made to the SPRC for review of the student’s progress, the student shall also be given the opportunity to submit a report.  The SPRC shall inform the student of the outcome of the progress review, and the appropriate registration status.

5.5 Annual Progress Review

5.5.1 The School shall appoint a progress review panel for each student.  This should comprise two independent members of staff.  One member of the supervisory team, preferably the principal supervisor, may be present to provide input, but may not take part in making the final recommendation concerning the student’s progress.  The progress of each student must be reviewed annually until the research degree is awarded.  The SPRC may specify more frequent reviews at its discretion.  For students who are required to differentiate to Doctoral status (e.g. PhD students), it is recommended that reviews are held within nine months to allow for any remedial actions arising from the review to be completed within the year.  Registration at the beginning of an academic year shall be dependent on the completion of a satisfactory progress report by the end of the previous academic year.  The normal outcome of the Annual Progress Review is that the student progresses to the next year, unconditionally or subject to the completion of specific targets.

5.5.2 The Annual Progress Review procedure shall be deemed equivalent to a Board of Examiners and therefore the University's Procedures for Dealing with Academic Offences or Regulations Governing the Allegation and Investigation of Misconduct in Research shall apply to any reported or suspected research misconduct.

5.5.3 The exact format of the Annual Progress Review shall be determined, at School level, by discipline and year of study, but must contain the following three elements:

1. A written submission from the student.
2. A meeting with the student, whereby the student can be questioned about their work by the progress review panel.
3. A documented outcome of the review and the progression decision.

5.5.4 The progress review panel shall make one of the following recommendations regarding progression, for the approval of the SPRC:

1. That the student’s performance is satisfactory, and that the student be permitted to proceed to the next stage.  For students who are required to differentiate to Doctoral status (e.g. PhD students), this shall comprise a recommendation to permit registration on the appropriate research degree programme.
2. That, notwithstanding some concerns, which the student and supervisory team should act upon, the student’s overall performance is satisfactory, and that the student be permitted to proceed to the next stage.  For students who are required to differentiate to Doctoral status (e.g. PhD students), this shall comprise a recommendation to permit registration on the appropriate research degree programme.
3. That the student’s performance is unsatisfactory, and that a further assessment be held within a specified period (normally 3 months FTE) to determine whether progress on the programme shall be recommended.  For students who are required to differentiate to Doctoral status (e.g. PhD students), this may comprise a recommendation that the student be permitted a second attempt at differentiation.  Students may not make more than two attempts at differentiation/Annual Progress Review.  Students shall normally be offered a second attempt before recommendation iv or v is made.
4. That the student’s performance is unsatisfactory and that a submission for the appropriate Master’s degree examination (MPhil, or as specified in appropriate programme specifications) be recommended instead of a submission for a Doctoral degree examination, for students enrolled on a Doctoral programme.
5. That the student’s performance is unsatisfactory and that no submission for a Doctoral degree or Master’s degree examination be recommended, and that registration be terminated.

5.5.5 For students who are completing the final year of their normal period of study, the progress review panel shall confirm whether or not the student has completed all the necessary research and should be permitted to register for writing-up status (see 2.3 iii). If all the necessary research is not complete, the progress review panel may specify a further period of full-time or part-time registration to complete the research before the student can register for writing-up status.

5.5.6 The SPRC shall consider progress review panel recommendations and shall invite any student who has received a recommendation under iv or v above to appear before it before the decision is confirmed (see 5.6).  The SPRC shall inform each student of the outcome of the progress review exercise, and the appropriate registration status.

5.5.7 Students who are dissatisfied with the outcome of the progress review may submit an academic appeal (research degree programmes) if a ground for appeal is evidenced.

5.5.8 Students registered for the PhD by Published Works shall normally have completed the programme within 1 year of registration, and therefore shall not be expected to engage in Annual Progress Review.  However, it may be useful for the student to undergo a mock viva prior to submission in preparation for the oral examination.  If an extension is granted beyond the normal 1-year period of study, due to extenuating circumstances, progress must be reviewed annually until the research degree is awarded.

5.6 School Postgraduate Research Committee (or equivalent)

5.6.1 Each School shall have a committee responsible for implementing University policy on admission of postgraduate research students, appointment of supervisors and internal examiners, differentiation, progress monitoring and review, and any other policies or issues affecting postgraduate research students.  The Committee shall be chaired by the Head of School (or nominee of senior lecturer level or above), and normally include up to eight other members of academic staff.  Where possible, there will be an equal gender balance on committees.  A quorum shall comprise the Chairperson and three other members.  Where appropriate (e.g. when considering students who are undertaking an interdisciplinary project) the School may invite staff from another School to assist in its deliberations.  Minutes shall be taken as a formal record of SPRC meetings, and retained.

5.6.2 Students asked to appear before a SPRC may be accompanied by a registered student of the University (which shall include a Students’ Union Sabbatical Officer) or by a member of staff of the University or University Chaplaincy.

5.6.3 On consideration of any case referred to it, a SPRC shall have the power to do any one or more of the following as it considers appropriate:

1. To advise students of the course of action considered to be in their best interests with a view to completing a degree or other programmes of the University.  This may include temporary withdrawal or transferring to another programme, if appropriate.
2. To require students to follow a specified course of action to meet specified targets, provided such targets do not normally exceed what would be required for the student to restore his/her good academic standing.
3. To require students who have persistently failed progress review to withdraw from their current pathway, or transfer to another programme.
4. To require students who have persistently failed progress review to withdraw from the University.
5. To enact the University's Guidelines on Fitness to Continue in Study on the Grounds of Health and/or Safety where the student’s medical fitness is in question.
6. To refer the case to the Director of Academic Services where the student’s fitness to practise his/her chosen profession is in question.

5.6.4 Where students fail to satisfy a requirement imposed under ii, the SPRC may either impose a further requirement under ii, or require students to withdraw from the programme or University as appropriate to the circumstances of the case.  In such cases the student shall have the right to appear before the SPRC meeting at which the withdrawal decision is taken or confirmed.  All SPRC decisions shall be confirmed in writing to the student concerned within five working days of the decision being made.

---

6. Assessment/Award

6.1 Notice of Intention to Submit

6.1.1Students shall prepare a detailed timetable to prepare and submit their final research degree submission for assessment, in consultation with the supervisors, at least six months before the end of the normal period of study. This shall not be required for PhD by Published.

6.1.2 Students must give at least 3 months’ notice to the SPRC of intention to submit their research degree submission.  The Student Registry website provides final submission deadlines regarding eligibility for graduation.

6.1.3 Students must be registered as research students in the academic year in which their research degree submission is submitted.

6.1.4 Students who fail to submit by the notified date must notify the SPRC of a new date of submission, after consultation with their supervisors.

6.1.5 The principal supervisor must ensure that appropriate sections of the submission have been submitted to the University-recognised similarity checking service, and the report used for feedback purposes, prior to the final research degree submission.

6.2 Title and Format of Research Degree Submission

6.2.1 Students shall specify the title of the research degree submission when giving notice of intention to submit.  The title may not be changed thereafter, except with the permission of the SPRC.

6.2.2 All research degree submissions must be written in English. Students may, however, apply to the SPRC at the time of registration to write a thesis in a language other than English where the language is relevant to the subject of the research. Where permission is given to write in a language other than English, the summary of the submission and its title must be given both in English and the approved language.

6.2.3 The layout of the research degree submission must conform to the format prescribed by Student Administration and Systems and the University’s Open Research Team.

6.2.4 The research degree submission should not exceed the following word limit (excluding appendices and the bibliography):

Research Degree Programme	Word Limit
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)	80,000*
Integrated Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)	80,000*
Master of Philosophy (MPhil)	50,000**
Doctor of Medicine (MD)	80,000
Master of Surgery (MCh)	50,000
Doctor of Childhood Studies (DChild)	50,000
Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (DClinPsych)	40,000
Doctor of Education (EdD)	40,000
Doctor of Education (EdD) TESOL	40,000
Doctorate in Educational, Child & Adolescent Psychology (DECAP)	30,000
Doctorate in Midwifery Practice (DMP)	40,000
Doctorate in Nursing Practice (DNP)	40,000
Engineering Doctorate (EngD)	80,000
Juris Doctor (JD)	30,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* A maximum page length of 300 pages may apply in lieu of the 80,000 word limit, where this is appropriate for the discipline and the research project.

** A maximum page length of 200 pages may apply in lieu of the 50,000 word limit, where this is appropriate for the discipline and the research project.

6.2.5 The first page of the research degree submission must give the author’s full names, degrees, School, the approved title of the submission, the degree for which it is offered, and the date.

6.3 Research Degree Submission Models

The research degree submission should conform to one of the following submission models:

6.3.1 Monograph Thesis

6.3.1.1 This is a unified document comprising several chapters with an introduction and conclusion. The student is the sole author of this thesis. See Thesis Format Guidelines

6.3.2 Thesis with Publications

6.3.2.1 This allows for the incorporation of material within the thesis which has been published or is in a format suitable for publication. Only publications which have been produced during registration on a research degree programme at the University can be included. See Guidelines for Thesis with Publications.

6.3.3 Creative Practice Portfolio

6.3.3.1 The submission of a creative practice portfolio research project for the degree of PhD shall comprise:

1. Original creative work(s) presented in the appropriate form(s) for the subject field(s).
2. A critical analysis, written in English, defining the research objectives of the creative work(s); addressing its intellectual and theoretical contexts; reflecting on research methodologies, production processes and the relation between them; analysing, and outlining other factors taken into account in its conception, development, and conclusions.

6.3.3.2 The written critical analysis (ii) shall be a maximum of 60,000 words (excluding references, appendices, and bibliography) and must be of Doctoral standard.  It is expected that the relative weighting of the practice and critical components will be indicated at the Annual Progress Review/differentiation interview in year 1 of the PhD.

6.3.3.3 Parts i and ii of the portfolio must be comprehensively and convincingly integrated and the complete submitted portfolio must reach the required standard for research degree programmes. The practice component must demonstrate a high level of skill in the manipulation of the material of production and involve a research inquiry.

6.3.3.4 Where an exhibition or live performance is involved, it may be necessary to appoint external and internal examiners earlier than is customary for traditionally written PhDs.  If process or product (perhaps presented well in advance of the written submission) is to be examined, external and internal examiners shall need access to that process and/or product.

6.3.3.5 In some cases, where multiple practice events form part of a submission, if the examiners are satisfied with the levels of access to practice they are afforded, it may not be a necessary condition of the assessment that they are given access to all the manifestations of practice.  Such circumstances shall be agreed in advance.  In such cases, it is expected that documentation of practice shall form an integral part of the submission.

6.3.3.6 Prior to attendance at any live performance/exhibition, external and internal examiners must receive from the student a statement of no more than 1000 words contextualising the practice component and outlining the research questions being addressed.

6.3.3.7 Where live performance/exhibitions form part of the practice component, permanent records of this research practice (DVD recordings, audio recordings, photographs, or other appropriate records) must be submitted in appropriate form and be uploaded alongside into the final version of the portfolio.  Other documentation relevant to the practice may be included as an appendix to the portfolio.

6.3.3.8 The submission for the degree of PhD by Published Works shall comprise:

1. A title page, giving the author’s full names, degrees, School, the title of the work, the degree for which it is offered, and the date.
2. A statement, in the case of multi-authored, joint or collaborative work, of the extent of the student’s own contribution, substantiated by the co-author(s) or collaborator(s).  It is expected that the student will have been a major contributor to each published work.
3. A critical analysis, not exceeding 10,000 words, of the published works included in the submission.  This shall include a statement of the contribution of the work to the advancement of the field of study, a critical account of its significance, an explanation of the inter-relationship between the material presented, and a critical appraisal and discussion of the corpus.
4. Copies of the published works which should comprise research outputs which match the criteria for submission to the periodic national research assessment exercises.  A work shall be regarded as published only if it is traceable in ordinary catalogues, abstract or citation notices, and web-based materials only if copies of it are, or have been, available to the general public through normal channels.  Documents prepared for a restricted readership and/or on a confidential basis shall not be eligible for inclusion in a submission for this degree.  Proofs of papers not yet published but accepted for publication shall be acceptable in their final format.  Any material which has been previously submitted by the student for another degree must be clearly specified and will not be included in the assessment of the works.  The degree will not be awarded unless substantial new work of the appropriate standard is also submitted.  Only works published within the 10-year period prior to submission for the degree will be considered.

6.4 Requirements for the Master’s Degree by Research

6.4.1 Master’s degrees are awarded to students who have demonstrated:

1. A systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of an academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice.
2. A comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to their own research or advanced scholarship.
3. Originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline.
4. Conceptual understanding that enables the student:
   1. To evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline.
   2. To evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and, where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses.

6.4.2 Typically, holders of the qualification will be able to:

1. Deal with complex issues both systematically and creatively, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
2. Demonstrate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level.
3. Continue to advance their knowledge and understanding, and to develop new skills to a high level.

6.4.3 Holders will have:

The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring:

1. The exercise of initiative and personal responsibility.
2. Decision making in complex and unpredictable situations.
3. The independent learning ability required for continuing professional development.

6.5 Requirements for the Doctoral Degree

6.5.1 Doctoral degrees are awarded to students who have demonstrated:

1. The creation and interpretation of new knowledge, through original research or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, extend the forefront of the discipline, and merit publication.
2. A systematic acquisition and understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice.
3. The general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, applications or understanding at the forefront of the discipline, and to adjust the project design in the light of unforeseen problems.
4. A detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry.

6.5.2 Typically, holders of the qualification will be able to:

1. Make informed judgements on complex issues in specialist fields, often in the absence of complete data, and be able to communicate their ideas and conclusions clearly and effectively to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
2. Continue to undertake pure and/or applied research and development at an advanced level, contributing substantially to the development of new techniques, ideas, or approaches.

6.5.3 Holders will have:

1. The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and largely autonomous initiative in complex and unpredictable situations, in professional or equivalent environments.

6.6 Procedure for Research Degree Submission for Examination

6.6.1 Students must submit to Student Administration and Systems an electronic copy of the submission to be examined.

6.6.2 On submitting a research degree submission students must sign a statement that:

1. The submission is not one for which a degree has been or will be conferred by any other university or institution (unless otherwise permitted under an approved collaborative research degree agreement).
2. The submission is not one for which a degree has already been conferred by this University.
3. The work for the submission is the student’s own and that, where material submitted by the student for another degree or work undertaken by the student as part of a research group has been incorporated into the submission, the extent of the work thus incorporated has been clearly indicated.
4. The composition of the submission is the student’s own work.

6.7 Appointment of Examiners

6.7.1 The SPRC shall appoint internal examiners and nominate external examiners for approval in line with the relevant academic governance process on behalf of Academic Council.  There shall be two examiners, one internal and one external examiner.  For PhD by Published Works, there shall be two external examiners.

6.7.2 Where the student is a member of staff, or in any other case where personal interest might be involved, a second external examiner must be appointed in lieu of the internal examiner.  The two external examiners must each come from different institutions or organisations.

6.7.3 The examiners shall not have had substantial co-authoring or collaborative involvement in the student’s work, nor examine a submission whose focus is the examiner’s own work, nor have any links, including personal links, with the student which could be perceived to influence their judgement. 

6.7.4 The external examiner should be a current member of staff from an external university, who holds an academic position of senior lecturer or above (or equivalent). External examiners from outside the higher education system, for example from industry or the professions, may be appropriate for research degree submissions in some disciplines, subject to evidence of appropriate experience. An external examiner must not have been a member of staff or a student of the University at any time during the three years prior to appointment.

6.7.5 The internal examiner should be a current member of staff from the University, who holds an academic position of lecturer or above. Lecturers on probation are not permitted as internal examiners. Research fellows leading an independent research programme and of equivalent status to lecturer or above, or a holder of an institutional fellowship appointed under the Queen’s University Research Fellowship scheme are also eligible for appointment. In exceptional circumstances, honorary title holders may be appointed as internal examiners in Medicine, Health and Life Sciences.

6.7.6 Only persons of seniority and experience who are able to command authority within the area of research concerned shall be appointed as examiners. Between them, the external and internal examiners should have an appropriate and balanced level of seniority and experience. It is expected that collectively, the examination panel will have examined at least three research degree final viva examinations, with at least one in a UK university. Where in exceptional circumstances an external examiner is not at least a senior lecturer (or equivalent), the internal examiner must be at least a senior lecturer (or equivalent).

6.7.7 The principal, second or co-supervisor (or any other supervisor) may not be appointed as an examiner.

6.8 The Examination Process

6.8.1 The examiners shall each prepare an independent report on the research degree submission before the oral examination.

6.8.2 There shall be an oral examination attended by the internal and external examiners and independently convened by a Director of Research of the University (or University nominee of equivalent experience, i.e. senior lecturer or above).

6.8.3 The oral examination shall be held in-person at the University or take place remotely using online software. The SPRC shall determine the specific arrangements for each oral examination.

6.8.4 The oral examination must take place without undue delay, normally within three months from the date the submission is sent to the examiners.

6.8.5 The student may not communicate with the examiners about the thesis before the oral examination.

6.8.6 After the oral examination, the examiners, via the School, must send Student Administration and Systems all the independent reports plus a joint report which includes one of the following decisions:

1. The student has met Doctoral standard and the Doctoral degree be awarded as the research degree submission stands.
2. The student has met Doctoral standard and the Doctoral degree be awarded subject to corrections* being made to the research degree submission that must be completed within three months.
3. The student has met Doctoral standard and the Doctoral degree be awarded subject to corrections* being made to the research degree submission that must be completed within six months.
4. The student has not met Doctoral standard and the submission should be revised and re-submitted** for the Doctoral degree at a later date. Students are only permitted to revise and re-submit a research degree submission once, not counting corrections outlined in ii or iii above. When making this decision, examiners may also propose one of v, vi, or vii below as a possible alternative. The student must confirm the preferred option.
5. The student has met Master’s degree by Research standard and a Master’s degree by Research be awarded as the research degree submission stands.
6. The student has met Master’s degree by Research standard and a Master’s degree by Research be awarded subject to corrections* being made to the research degree submission that must be completed within three months.
7. The student has met Master’s degree by Research standard and a Master’s degree by Research be awarded subject to corrections* being made to the research degree submission that must be completed within six months.
8. The student has not met Master’s degree by Research standard and the submission be revised and re-submitted** for a Master’s degree at a later Students are only permitted to revise and re-submit a research degree submission once, not counting corrections outlined in vi or vii above.
9. No degree be awarded.

For PhD by Published Works, any required corrections shall relate to the critical analysis.  Decision viii above is not applicable for PhD by Published Works.

* The examiners must provide a record of the corrections required with the submission of the completed examination forms. Students must complete the corrections to the satisfaction of the internal examiner within three or six months (as determined within the Joint Report) from receipt of the examination outcome letter and notification of the corrections required.

** Revision and re-submission reflects that substantial revisions are required to make the research degree submission acceptable. The internal examiner (or individual appointed under 7.6.3) must submit to Student Administration and Systems, via the School, written notification of the major revisions required, along with the completed examination forms, within eight working days of the oral examination. (If the examiners have also proposed a possible alternative option from vi or vii above, the internal examiner must submit to Student Administration and Systems, via the School, written notification of the appropriate amendments required by the appropriate deadline, within eight working days of the oral examination.) Students must complete major revisions and resubmit the research degree submission for re-examination, within twelve months of receipt of the examination outcome letter and notification of the major revisions required. A new oral examination shall be required for the resubmission. The same examiners as for the original submission shall examine the resubmission.

6.8.7 Students who fail to submit a corrected or revised research degree submission by the date set by the examiners shall be regarded as having failed the examination and the decisions of the examiners shall lapse.

6.8.8 If the examiners cannot reach agreement on a decision, the internal examiner (or Convenor, if no internal examiner was appointed) shall notify the Chair of the SPRC, who shall arrange for an additional external examiner to be appointed following the procedures set out in 7.6.  The additional external examiner shall be informed that the original examiners have been unable to reach agreement and shall be sent the independent reports.  The decision of the new external examiner shall be final.

6.8.9 If the Board of Examiners wishes to depart in any way from the normal examination procedures, the SPRC Chair shall seek permission from the Director of Academic Services.

6.8.10 Students who are dissatisfied with the outcome of the examination process may submit an academic appeal (research degree programmes) if a ground for appeal is evidenced.

6.9 Copyright

All submitted copies of a research degree submission, whether or not adjudged by the examiners to deserve the degree, remain the property of the University. The University shall assign the copyright of a submission back to the author as per clauses 19 and 20 of the University’s Intellectual Property (IP) Policy.

6.10 Library Regulations

6.10.1 Where the examiners decide to award a degree and before the result is officially posted, the student must submit to the University’s Research Portal (Pure) an electronic copy of the research degree submission certified by an examiner as being the accepted copy of the submission (containing any amendments required by the examiners) and the approved summary of the work.

6.10.2 The student must agree that the submission be stored and made available publicly in electronic format unless an embargo period has been approved.

6.10.3 For PhD by Published Works, the student must also submit one copy of the submission, bound in the manner of a book, to Student Administration and Systems. This copy shall be deposited in the University Library.

6.10.4 Upon ratification of the electronic submission to the University’s Research Portal, Student Administration and Systems will confirm completion of the degree to the student.